Three is NOT a Crowd in this Lesbian 3-Some Marriage

0
197
fred-deruvo-dir

fred-deruvo-dirGosh, to look at these gals, you’re supposed to think that not only is there nothing wrong with women marrying each other, but it’s okay for three women to be married to one another in the same relationship. They were all married together and wore white on the day of their wedding. Technically, having three people married to one another is not yet legal, though given time it will be, I’m sure. In the meanwhile, two of the women, Brynn and Kitten are legally married, while Doll is what is known as “handfasted” to the two women. It’s about as legal as one can get in today’s society.

“The so-called ‘throuple’ worked with a specialist family lawyer who drew up the paperwork and drafted the ceremony so that all three of them were obligated and bound to each other.”

Handfasted “refers to one of two types of ceremonies, either a ‘wedding’ or a betrothal of a year and a day, which the participants can then decide to renew or not at the end of that period.” It is big in Pagan, Neo-Pagan, and Wiccan ceremonies. Many see it as an equivalent to what is often referred to as common-law marriages.

thropple
Doll, Kitten, and Brynn – a “throuple”

The three women – residing in Massachusetts – are also having children, with Kitten giving birth to all of them. The threesome want to have three children and currently, Kitten is pregnant with sperm from an anonymous donor. For future pregnancies, plans may include eggs from either Doll or Brynn.

The truth of the matter is that once the door is thrown wide open for same-sex unions, then how is possible that polygamy can remain outlawed? It can’t because laws against it would fall due to the same reasons laws against same-sex marriages have fallen and continue to fall. It all has to do with redefining marriage and since the Obama regime has publicly stated that they will no longer support the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), it sends a clear signal that ultimately says the administration is completely open to rewriting the definition of marriage.

Eventually, once society has been railroaded into accepting as normal same-sex marriages, then threesomes will be the next hill to climb. After that, as numerous pundits have pointed out, what is to say that people will not be able to marry their pets?

The refusal of the Obama administration and too many politicians to count to void their support of traditional marriage says a great deal about the culture and the direction in which it is moving. Eventually, the term marriage will come to mean whatever people want it to mean. I can easily foresee a day when marriage isn’t even entered into. Instead, people will just cohabitate and then when that gets old, seek out new pastures. We already see that with this one example of a threesome.

The interesting thing about this particular threesome mentioned in this article is that “It was back in 2009 that Brynn first met Doll through an online dating site. Senior Software Designer and Engineer, Brynn had been married twice before to women and both experiences had made her acknowledge that monogamous relationships weren’t for her.”

My question is why bother getting married? Brynn has acknowledged that she was married before – twice – and both spouses were women. However, coming out of her second marriage proved in her mind that having a monogamous relationship was just not right…for her.

It will be interesting to see what the divorce rate for same-sex unions ends up being, that is, if anyone keeps tracks. But in the end, it is not about granting alleged equal rights to gays and lesbians in the area of holy matrimony. The ultimate goal – whether all those within the gay and lesbian community realize it or not – is to eradicate what has always been known, understood, and accepted as traditional marriage; that marriage is between one man and one woman.

I’ve said it before and so have others. Gay activists simply want to destroy marriage. The often quick retort from the left that “heterosexuals have already destroyed marriage” has nothing to do with my point. Yes, many within the heterosexual community have put a black mark on marriage because of how easily they enter and exit marriage relationships.

But when I say that the gay and lesbian community want to destroy marriage, I’m saying that they want to eradicate the term and the institution of traditional marriage. Because of it, there will likely come a day when people who marry and remain married happily until the death of one of the spouses, will be ridiculed by the left. That is tragic, but it will very likely become reality.

Society wants no part of God or His Word. The majority of society wants to do only what they want to do. They want no thought of God unless it is a god they create, define, and control for themselves. That type of god is ultimately SELF.

As a kid, I never would have been able to picture the way society has overturned so many biblical precepts. Yet, here it is and it seems to be getting worse by the day.

I am not aware of any past society or civilization in which gay marriage was accepted as normal. It is fast becoming the new norm and once that happens, watch for marriage itself to go the way of the dinosaur.

By Fred DeRuvo — visit Fred’s site at http://studygrowknowblog.com

NO COMMENTS